Alternative Power Sources for Data Centers

Welcome to Keep Your Cool - a blog about simple cooling optimization strategies for the busy data center operators.

As data centers scale to meet the demands of AI and high-density compute, power availability has become a critical constraint—often more limiting than space or cooling capacity. Grid infrastructure upgrades are expensive and slow-moving, prompting operators to ask a new question: Can we power our facilities locally?

In this post, we review six leading options for on-site or locally sourced power, summarizing their readiness, regulatory hurdles, land and capital requirements, and sustainability.

These rankings are based upon current regulations and operational readiness of 100 MW of each. It must be noted that there are trials underway with some of the newer technologies and perhaps with their success some updated regulations may come into effect, but for now that is all speculative..

Key Evaluation Criteria:

1. Permitting & Regulation: Can this option get approved in time?

2. Capital Cost & ROI: What’s the real investment, and how long to break even?

3. Land Use: Does the solution scale within available acreage?

4. Lead Time: How fast can it be deployed and commissioned?

5. Reliability: Is it stable and proven?

6. Sustainability: What’s the long-term environmental impact?

Comparison Table

Power Source	CapEx (Est.)	ROI	Lead Time	Land Required	Reliability	Sustainability	Regulatory Complexity	Notes
Natural Gas Generators	$100M–$150M	3–6 years	12–24 months	5–10 acres	High	Low	Low	Well-established, fast deployment, limited environmental appeal
Fuel Cells	$250M–$400M	6–10 years	12–24 months	3–6 acres	High	Medium–High	Medium	Modular and cleaner, but early in adoption and permitting varies
Wind Turbines	$200M–$350M	12–20 years	18–36 months	10,000–15,000 acres	Medium	High	High	Sustainable but land-intensive and often opposed by communities
Diesel Generators	$80M–$120M	4–7 years (backup only)	3–6 months	5–12 acres	High	Low	Medium–High	Reliable for backup, but heavily restricted as a primary power source
Small Modular Reactors (SMRs)	$1.5B–$3.0B	20–30+ years	5–10+ years	10–20 core + 100+ buffer acres	Very High	Very High	Very High	Long-term potential, but not viable short-term due to regulation
Solar + Battery Storage	$300M–$500M	10–15 years	12–24 months	400–600 acres	Medium	High	Medium–High	Excellent long-term strategy; needs space and grid interconnection

Onsite Natural Gas Generators

A mature and widely adopted solution, gas generators offer reliable, dispatchable power without requiring grid interconnection. Permitting is typically straightforward, and fuel is readily available—but sustainability remains a concern.

• Pros: Mature technology, streamlined permitting, reliable fuel access

• Cons: Low sustainability, moderate capex

• Est. Cost: $100M–$150M

• ROI: 3–6 years

• Land Required: 5–10 acres

• Lead Time: 12–24 months

• Reliability: High

• Sustainability: Low

Fuel Cells (Hydrogen or Natural Gas)

Fuel cells generate electricity through a chemical reaction rather than combustion. They're quiet, modular, and produce fewer emissions—but are still early in data center adoption. Permitting can be complex, and hydrogen supply chains are still developing.

1. Pros: Modular, space-efficient, cleaner than combustion

2. Cons: Permitting is complex and inconsistent; still early in adoption

3. Est. Cost: $250M–$400M

4. ROI: 6–10 years

5. Land Required: 3–6 acres

6. Lead Time: 12–24 months

7. Reliability: High

8. Sustainability: Medium to High

Wind Turbines:

A renewable option that leverages large-scale wind farms to generate clean energy. While highly sustainable, wind projects often face zoning restrictions, community resistance, and require significant land area—making them better suited for rural, low-density deployments.

1. Pros: Modular, space-efficient, cleaner than combustion

2. Cons: More Complex due to Zoning, height restrictions, environmental and wildlife impact studies, community opposition. Heavily regulated in most regions

3. Est. Cost: $250M–$400M

4. ROI: 6–10 years

5. Land Required: 3–6 acres

6. Lead Time: 12–24 months

7. Reliability: High

8. Sustainability: Medium to High

Diesel Generators

Often used for backup, diesel gensets are fast to deploy and highly reliable in emergencies. However, strict emissions regulations limit their use for primary power, and long-term sustainability is low.

1. Pros: Fast to deploy, well-understood

2. Cons: Emission limits often restrict to emergency use only

3. Est. Cost: $80M–$120M

4. ROI: 4–7 years (backup only)

5. Land Required: 5–12 acres

6. Lead Time: 3–6 months (likely longer due to supply pressure)

7. Reliability: High

8. Sustainability: Low

Small Modular Reactors (Nuclear/ SMRS)

Next-generation nuclear reactors promise high-density, zero-carbon power in a smaller footprint than traditional plants. Still in the pilot stage, SMRs face long regulatory timelines and are not yet commercially viable—but could reshape the market in a decade.

1. Pros: Extremely reliable, no emissions

2. Cons: SMRs face long regulatory timelines and are not yet commercially viable—but could reshape the market in a decade.

3. Est. Cost: $1.5B–$3.0B

4. ROI: 20–30 years+

5. Land Required: 10–20 acres core + 100+ acres safety buffer

6. Lead Time: 5–10+ years

7. Reliability: Very High

8. Sustainability: Very High

Solar and Battery Storage

A clean, scalable energy solution that combines on-site solar generation with battery storage for resiliency. Highly sustainable, but very land-intensive and less predictable without a grid tie. Ideal as a supplement or for long-term strategy.

1. Pros: Highly sustainable, proven technology

2. Cons: Very land-intensive; medium reliability without grid tie, Requires Environmental Assessments, Interconnection agreements, and zoning approvals. If grid-tie is involved Utility and Public Utility Commission approvals can be complex.

3. Est. Cost: $300M–$500M (200 MW solar + 800 MWh battery)

4. ROI: 10–15 years

5. Land Required: 400–600 acres

6. Lead Time: 12–24 months

7. Reliability: Medium

8. Sustainability: High

Conclusion

While there are several viable solutions available today the Gas fired generator would appear to be the best option. However, with several trials underway deploying some of the alternative technologies I am certain that there will be some breakthroughs as discoveries are identified in those trials. Just as the new ever increasing power hungry racks are becoming a fixture of AI Hyperscalers data centers, professionals are looking to find solutions to powering them without killing the Grid that powers everything else.

About Purkay Labs

Purkay Labs provides practical, field-ready tools to help data center operators validate airflow, improve cooling efficiency, and optimize resiliency at the rack level. Our flagship product, AUDIT-BUDDY, is a portable, non-intrusive system that delivers real-time temperature and delta-T insights—without requiring shutdowns or permanent installation.

Designed for facility managers, engineers, and commissioning teams, our solutions are used for spot-checks, troubleshooting, pre-deployment validation, and failure-mode testing. Whether you're managing legacy infrastructure or scaling to meet AI workloads, Purkay Labs helps you make data-driven decisions that improve performance and protect uptime.

Learn more at www.purkaylabs.com.

About the Author

Gregg Haley is a data center and telecommunications executive with more than 30 years of leadership experience. Most recently served as the Senior Director of Data Center Operations - Global for Limelight Networks. Gregg provides data center assessment and optimization reviews showing businesses how to reduce operating expenses by identifying energy conservation opportunities. Through infrastructure optimization energy expenses can be reduced by 10% to 30%.

In addition to Gregg's data center efforts, he has a certification from the Disaster Recovery Institute International (DRII) as Business Continuity Planner. In November of 2005, Gregg was a founding member and Treasurer of the Association of Contingency Planners - Greater Boston Chapter, a non-profit industry association dedicated to the promotion and education of Business Continuity Planning. Gregg had served on the chapter's Board of Directors for the first four years. Gregg is also a past member of the American Society of Industrial Security (ASIS).

Gregg currently serves as the Principal Consultant for Purkay Labs.